Recent releases have intensified competition on Code Arena WebDev, where OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed the top spot with strong agentic frontend and full-stack coding results, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 series previously led and maintains close scores. Trader consensus around 30% implied probability for several labs—including Z.ai, Anthropic, MiniMax, and Google—reflects rapid iteration by Chinese developers on cost-efficient large language models that excel in multi-step web development tasks and Pareto-optimal pricing. Key swing factors include upcoming model updates, benchmark volatility in real-world HTML/React workflows, and whether open-weight contenders can sustain gains against proprietary frontier systems before November resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于SpaceXAI 34%
Anthropic 31%
MiniMax 31%
谷歌 25%

SpaceXAI
34%

Anthropic
31%

MiniMax
31%

谷歌
25%

字节跳动
25%

Z.ai
23%

Meta
21%

OpenAI
20%

Poolside
19%

Thinky
16%

小米
14%

Moonshot
13%

阿里巴巴
9%

Mistral
22%

DeepSeek
3%

腾讯
3%
SpaceXAI 34%
Anthropic 31%
MiniMax 31%
谷歌 25%

SpaceXAI
34%

Anthropic
31%

MiniMax
31%

谷歌
25%

字节跳动
25%

Z.ai
23%

Meta
21%

OpenAI
20%

Poolside
19%

Thinky
16%

小米
14%

Moonshot
13%

阿里巴巴
9%

Mistral
22%

DeepSeek
3%

腾讯
3%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市场开放时间: Sep 17, 2026, 8:13 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Recent releases have intensified competition on Code Arena WebDev, where OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed the top spot with strong agentic frontend and full-stack coding results, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 series previously led and maintains close scores. Trader consensus around 30% implied probability for several labs—including Z.ai, Anthropic, MiniMax, and Google—reflects rapid iteration by Chinese developers on cost-efficient large language models that excel in multi-step web development tasks and Pareto-optimal pricing. Key swing factors include upcoming model updates, benchmark volatility in real-world HTML/React workflows, and whether open-weight contenders can sustain gains against proprietary frontier systems before November resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题