Trader sentiment reflects a fragmented field where OpenAI holds the highest implied probability at 29% for second-best AI agent lab by end of November, supported by its demonstrated agentic workflows, large language model integrations, and enterprise adoption. xAI, DeepSeek, and several others trail closely, each differentiated by specialized training methods, open-source benchmarks, or hardware synergies that influence capability evaluations. The tight spread among many contenders underscores rapid iteration in artificial intelligence, with trader consensus sensitive to verifiable model releases, third-party agent benchmarks, and competitive positioning rather than unconfirmed roadmaps. Upcoming developer events and capability demonstrations could shift these market-implied odds.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於OpenAI 32%
Anthropic 26%
Moonshot 26%
DeepSeek 26%

OpenAI
19%

Anthropic
27%

Moonshot
26%

DeepSeek
26%

小米
26%

百度
26%

Meta
26%

26%

阿里巴巴
25%

騰訊
25%

SpaceXAI
19%

Nvidia
16%

Mistral
15%

字節跳動
15%

微軟
14%

Z.ai
9%

MiniMax
6%

亞馬遜
6%

美團
4%
OpenAI 32%
Anthropic 26%
Moonshot 26%
DeepSeek 26%

OpenAI
19%

Anthropic
27%

Moonshot
26%

DeepSeek
26%

小米
26%

百度
26%

Meta
26%

26%

阿里巴巴
25%

騰訊
25%

SpaceXAI
19%

Nvidia
16%

Mistral
15%

字節跳動
15%

微軟
14%

Z.ai
9%

MiniMax
6%

亞馬遜
6%

美團
4%
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Agent Arena" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Agent Arena Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Sep 17, 2026, 8:03 PM ET
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Agent Arena" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Agent Arena Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Trader sentiment reflects a fragmented field where OpenAI holds the highest implied probability at 29% for second-best AI agent lab by end of November, supported by its demonstrated agentic workflows, large language model integrations, and enterprise adoption. xAI, DeepSeek, and several others trail closely, each differentiated by specialized training methods, open-source benchmarks, or hardware synergies that influence capability evaluations. The tight spread among many contenders underscores rapid iteration in artificial intelligence, with trader consensus sensitive to verifiable model releases, third-party agent benchmarks, and competitive positioning rather than unconfirmed roadmaps. Upcoming developer events and capability demonstrations could shift these market-implied odds.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions