Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4/5 variants currently anchor the top of the Text Arena math leaderboard through superior chain-of-thought reasoning on competition problems, leaving Google as the primary contender for second place with Gemini 3.x models posting competitive Elo ratings near 1522. Trader consensus around 38% implied probability for Google reflects recent Gemini flash and pro updates that narrowed gaps on math-specific votes, while OpenAI's GPT-5.5 series trails at roughly 29.5% due to stronger results on pure benchmarks like FrontierMath than on human-preference arena tasks. DeepSeek, Z.ai, and Moonshot models add pressure through efficient open-weight releases that challenge closed labs on specific math subsets. Upcoming model drops and continued arena voting through November will likely determine whether Google's multimodal scaling or OpenAI's research-level math focus shifts the ordering before resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoSecond-best Text Arena Math AI Lab end of November?
DeepSeek 33%
ByteDance 28%
Google 22%
Microsoft 19%

DeepSeek
33%

ByteDance
28%

22%

Microsoft
19%

OpenAI
18%

Alibaba
16%

Meituan
16%

MiniMax
15%

Z.ai
14%

SpaceXAI
14%

Meta
14%

Anthropic
13%

Moonshot
26%

Amazon
13%

Tencent
13%

StepFun
12%

Mistral
10%

Baidu
9%

Thinky
9%

Nvidia
8%

Xiaomi
7%
DeepSeek 33%
ByteDance 28%
Google 22%
Microsoft 19%

DeepSeek
33%

ByteDance
28%

22%

Microsoft
19%

OpenAI
18%

Alibaba
16%

Meituan
16%

MiniMax
15%

Z.ai
14%

SpaceXAI
14%

Meta
14%

Anthropic
13%

Moonshot
26%

Amazon
13%

Tencent
13%

StepFun
12%

Mistral
10%

Baidu
9%

Thinky
9%

Nvidia
8%

Xiaomi
7%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Math" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/math-no-style-control?rankBy=labs with style control off (Adjustments: None) and filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Text Arena (Math). If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Rynek otwarty: Sep 17, 2026, 8:05 PM ET
Rozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Math" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/math-no-style-control?rankBy=labs with style control off (Adjustments: None) and filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Text Arena (Math). If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Rozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4/5 variants currently anchor the top of the Text Arena math leaderboard through superior chain-of-thought reasoning on competition problems, leaving Google as the primary contender for second place with Gemini 3.x models posting competitive Elo ratings near 1522. Trader consensus around 38% implied probability for Google reflects recent Gemini flash and pro updates that narrowed gaps on math-specific votes, while OpenAI's GPT-5.5 series trails at roughly 29.5% due to stronger results on pure benchmarks like FrontierMath than on human-preference arena tasks. DeepSeek, Z.ai, and Moonshot models add pressure through efficient open-weight releases that challenge closed labs on specific math subsets. Upcoming model drops and continued arena voting through November will likely determine whether Google's multimodal scaling or OpenAI's research-level math focus shifts the ordering before resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania