Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日MiniMax 88%
Meituan 88%
Baidu 45%
Amazon 45%
新規
新規
2026/08/31
MiniMax
88%
Meituan
88%
Baidu
45%
Amazon
45%
Z.ai
44%
OpenAI
44%
Nvidia
44%
DeepSeek
43%
42%
SpaceXAI
42%
Meta
40%
Moonshot
40%
Xiaomi
36%
Thinky
36%
Alibaba
35%
Mistral
33%
Tencent
33%
Microsoft
33%
StepFun
33%
ByteDance
32%
Anthropic
46%
MiniMax 88%
Meituan 88%
Baidu 45%
Amazon 45%
新規
新規
2026/08/31
MiniMax
$80 Vol.
88%
Meituan
$50 Vol.
88%
Baidu
$50 Vol.
45%
Amazon
$50 Vol.
45%
Z.ai
$50 Vol.
44%
OpenAI
$50 Vol.
44%
Nvidia
$50 Vol.
44%
DeepSeek
$50 Vol.
43%
$50 Vol.
42%
SpaceXAI
$50 Vol.
42%
Meta
$50 Vol.
40%
Moonshot
$50 Vol.
40%
Xiaomi
$50 Vol.
36%
Thinky
$50 Vol.
36%
Alibaba
$50 Vol.
35%
Mistral
$50 Vol.
33%
Tencent
$50 Vol.
33%
Microsoft
$50 Vol.
33%
StepFun
$50 Vol.
33%
ByteDance
$50 Vol.
32%
Anthropic
$70 Vol.
46%
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on August 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on August 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
マーケット開始日： Jul 29, 2026, 6:17 PM ET
音量
$1,100終了日
2026/08/31マーケット開始日
Jul 29, 2026, 6:17 PM ETResolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on August 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on August 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
音量
$1,100終了日
2026/08/31マーケット開始日
Jul 29, 2026, 6:17 PM ETResolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問