California voters face competing November 2026 ballot measures that pit a proposed one-time 5% net-worth tax on billionaires—retroactive to January 1, 2026 residency—against Proposition 42, which would bar new state taxes on personal assets, retirement holdings, and savings while prohibiting most retroactive taxes. The billionaire-tax backers, including SEIU-UHW, argue the revenue would support healthcare amid federal changes, while Prop 42 supporters, including business-aligned donors, emphasize protection against surprise liabilities and planning uncertainty. Conflicting provisions trigger competing-measures rules that could nullify elements of either if both pass. With the race near even, outcomes hinge on turnout among high-income households, union mobilization, and any late legal or campaign developments clarifying fiscal impacts before election day.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日はい
48% 確率
新規
新規
2026/11/03
はい
48% 確率
新規
新規
2026/11/03
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).California voters face competing November 2026 ballot measures that pit a proposed one-time 5% net-worth tax on billionaires—retroactive to January 1, 2026 residency—against Proposition 42, which would bar new state taxes on personal assets, retirement holdings, and savings while prohibiting most retroactive taxes. The billionaire-tax backers, including SEIU-UHW, argue the revenue would support healthcare amid federal changes, while Prop 42 supporters, including business-aligned donors, emphasize protection against surprise liabilities and planning uncertainty. Conflicting provisions trigger competing-measures rules that could nullify elements of either if both pass. With the race near even, outcomes hinge on turnout among high-income households, union mobilization, and any late legal or campaign developments clarifying fiscal impacts before election day.
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
マーケット開始日： Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ET
音量
$0終了日
2026/11/03マーケット開始日
Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).California voters face competing November 2026 ballot measures that pit a proposed one-time 5% net-worth tax on billionaires—retroactive to January 1, 2026 residency—against Proposition 42, which would bar new state taxes on personal assets, retirement holdings, and savings while prohibiting most retroactive taxes. The billionaire-tax backers, including SEIU-UHW, argue the revenue would support healthcare amid federal changes, while Prop 42 supporters, including business-aligned donors, emphasize protection against surprise liabilities and planning uncertainty. Conflicting provisions trigger competing-measures rules that could nullify elements of either if both pass. With the race near even, outcomes hinge on turnout among high-income households, union mobilization, and any late legal or campaign developments clarifying fiscal impacts before election day.
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
音量
$0終了日
2026/11/03マーケット開始日
Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...California voters face competing November 2026 ballot measures that pit a proposed one-time 5% net-worth tax on billionaires—retroactive to January 1, 2026 residency—against Proposition 42, which would bar new state taxes on personal assets, retirement holdings, and savings while prohibiting most retroactive taxes. The billionaire-tax backers, including SEIU-UHW, argue the revenue would support healthcare amid federal changes, while Prop 42 supporters, including business-aligned donors, emphasize protection against surprise liabilities and planning uncertainty. Conflicting provisions trigger competing-measures rules that could nullify elements of either if both pass. With the race near even, outcomes hinge on turnout among high-income households, union mobilization, and any late legal or campaign developments clarifying fiscal impacts before election day.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問