President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日新規
$16,513 Vol.
2026/08/31
バラク・オバマ
95%
ニコラス・マドゥロ
68%
マージョリー・テイラー・グリーン
51%
ジミー・キンメル
49%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
49%
メーガン・ケリー
49%
ジェローム・パウエル
46%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
29%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
18%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
23%
アンディ・バーナム
15%
エマニュエル・マクロン
12%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
7%
ノラ・オドネル
7%
エロン・マスク
7%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
7%
レオ14世教皇
6%
習近平
6%
ヴィクトル・オルバン
5%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
5%
パム・ボンディ
3%
J.D.バンス
3%
メラニア・トランプ
1%
ケイトラン・コリンズ
43%
タッカー・カールソン
54%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
43%
$16,513 Vol.
バラク・オバマ
$1,708 Vol.
95%
ニコラス・マドゥロ
$0 Vol.
68%
マージョリー・テイラー・グリーン
$0 Vol.
51%
ジミー・キンメル
$0 Vol.
49%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
$303 Vol.
49%
メーガン・ケリー
$2 Vol.
49%
ジェローム・パウエル
$20 Vol.
46%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
$0 Vol.
29%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
$102 Vol.
18%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
$26 Vol.
23%
アンディ・バーナム
$1,036 Vol.
15%
エマニュエル・マクロン
$734 Vol.
12%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
$522 Vol.
7%
ノラ・オドネル
$1,039 Vol.
7%
エロン・マスク
$876 Vol.
7%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
$0 Vol.
7%
レオ14世教皇
$2,083 Vol.
6%
習近平
$279 Vol.
6%
ヴィクトル・オルバン
$0 Vol.
5%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
$0 Vol.
5%
パム・ボンディ
$0 Vol.
3%
J.D.バンス
$529 Vol.
3%
メラニア・トランプ
$2,946 Vol.
1%
ケイトラン・コリンズ
$361 Vol.
43%
タッカー・カールソン
$203 Vol.
54%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
$1,018 Vol.
43%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
音量
$16,513終了日
2026/08/31マーケット開始日
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$16,513終了日
2026/08/31マーケット開始日
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問