Trump's recent Truth Social activity centers on escalating rhetoric against Iran, labeling the regime a "failed nation" and asserting U.S. control over the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing military and economic tensions in early September 2026. This pattern of direct confrontation with foreign adversaries, combined with his longstanding habit of targeting journalists and domestic political opponents in public posts and speeches, shapes trader assessments of likely targets by September 30. Media coverage of administration statements on Iran has already drawn presidential pushback, while scheduled events such as rallies or press interactions could surface new criticisms. Resolution hinges on verifiable public statements from Trump himself within the timeframe.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato$35,687 Vol.
30 set 2026
Barack Obama
95%
Kathy Hochul
94%
Letitia James
87%
Hillary Clinton
81%
Tucker Carlson
71%
Mark Carney
62%
Kaitlan Collins
54%
Jimmy Kimmel
50%
Elizabeth Warren
48%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
39%
Norah O'Donnell
39%
Zohran Mamdani
33%
Friedrich Merz
31%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Andy Burnham
28%
Jerome Powell
24%
Pam Bondi
22%
Vladimir Putin
18%
Candace Owens
16%
Elon Musk
15%
Alex Jones
14%
Benjamin Netanyahu
13%
Megyn Kelly
26%
Emmanuel Macron
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Kevin Warsh
7%
Melania Trump
11%
Papa Leone XIV
6%
Xi Jinping
5%
J.D. Vance
4%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
J.B. Pritzker
50%
Jon Ossoff
48%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
48%
Adam Schiff
50%
Abdul El-Sayed
57%
Ilhan Omar
55%
$35,687 Vol.
Barack Obama
$2,139 Vol.
95%
Kathy Hochul
$1,369 Vol.
94%
Letitia James
$267 Vol.
87%
Hillary Clinton
$1,310 Vol.
81%
Tucker Carlson
$2,009 Vol.
71%
Mark Carney
$1,464 Vol.
62%
Kaitlan Collins
$624 Vol.
54%
Jimmy Kimmel
$766 Vol.
50%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
48%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,314 Vol.
39%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
39%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,228 Vol.
33%
Friedrich Merz
$766 Vol.
31%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
28%
Andy Burnham
$1,043 Vol.
28%
Jerome Powell
$492 Vol.
24%
Pam Bondi
$74 Vol.
22%
Vladimir Putin
$910 Vol.
18%
Candace Owens
$1,597 Vol.
16%
Elon Musk
$62 Vol.
15%
Alex Jones
$60 Vol.
14%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,189 Vol.
13%
Megyn Kelly
$312 Vol.
26%
Emmanuel Macron
$2,023 Vol.
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
$360 Vol.
7%
Kevin Warsh
$2,629 Vol.
7%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
11%
Papa Leone XIV
$936 Vol.
6%
Xi Jinping
$329 Vol.
5%
J.D. Vance
$1,162 Vol.
4%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Vol.
3%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Vol.
50%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
48%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Vol.
48%
Adam Schiff
$60 Vol.
50%
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,016 Vol.
57%
Ilhan Omar
$162 Vol.
55%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent Truth Social activity centers on escalating rhetoric against Iran, labeling the regime a "failed nation" and asserting U.S. control over the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing military and economic tensions in early September 2026. This pattern of direct confrontation with foreign adversaries, combined with his longstanding habit of targeting journalists and domestic political opponents in public posts and speeches, shapes trader assessments of likely targets by September 30. Media coverage of administration statements on Iran has already drawn presidential pushback, while scheduled events such as rallies or press interactions could surface new criticisms. Resolution hinges on verifiable public statements from Trump himself within the timeframe.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercato aperto: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$35,687Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent Truth Social activity centers on escalating rhetoric against Iran, labeling the regime a "failed nation" and asserting U.S. control over the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing military and economic tensions in early September 2026. This pattern of direct confrontation with foreign adversaries, combined with his longstanding habit of targeting journalists and domestic political opponents in public posts and speeches, shapes trader assessments of likely targets by September 30. Media coverage of administration statements on Iran has already drawn presidential pushback, while scheduled events such as rallies or press interactions could surface new criticisms. Resolution hinges on verifiable public statements from Trump himself within the timeframe.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$35,687Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...Trump's recent Truth Social activity centers on escalating rhetoric against Iran, labeling the regime a "failed nation" and asserting U.S. control over the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing military and economic tensions in early September 2026. This pattern of direct confrontation with foreign adversaries, combined with his longstanding habit of targeting journalists and domestic political opponents in public posts and speeches, shapes trader assessments of likely targets by September 30. Media coverage of administration statements on Iran has already drawn presidential pushback, while scheduled events such as rallies or press interactions could surface new criticisms. Resolution hinges on verifiable public statements from Trump himself within the timeframe.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti