President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoNUOVO
$16,481 Vol.
31 ago 2026
Barack Obama
95%
Nicolás Maduro
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
51%
Jimmy Kimmel
49%
Candace Owens
49%
Megyn Kelly
49%
Jerome Powell
46%
Zohran Mamdani
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
18%
Vladimir Putin
23%
Andy Burnham
15%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Norah O'Donnell
8%
Friedrich Merz
7%
Elon Musk
7%
Kevin Warsh
7%
Papa Leone XIV
6%
Xi Jinping
6%
Viktor Orbán
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
Pam Bondi
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Melania Trump
1%
Kaitlan Collins
43%
Tucker Carlson
53%
Alex Jones
48%
$16,481 Vol.
Barack Obama
$1,708 Vol.
95%
Nicolás Maduro
$0 Vol.
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$0 Vol.
51%
Jimmy Kimmel
$0 Vol.
49%
Candace Owens
$271 Vol.
49%
Megyn Kelly
$2 Vol.
49%
Jerome Powell
$20 Vol.
46%
Zohran Mamdani
$0 Vol.
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$102 Vol.
18%
Vladimir Putin
$26 Vol.
23%
Andy Burnham
$1,036 Vol.
15%
Emmanuel Macron
$734 Vol.
12%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,039 Vol.
8%
Friedrich Merz
$522 Vol.
7%
Elon Musk
$876 Vol.
7%
Kevin Warsh
$0 Vol.
7%
Papa Leone XIV
$2,083 Vol.
6%
Xi Jinping
$279 Vol.
6%
Viktor Orbán
$0 Vol.
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
$0 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$0 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$529 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$2,946 Vol.
1%
Kaitlan Collins
$361 Vol.
43%
Tucker Carlson
$203 Vol.
53%
Alex Jones
$1,018 Vol.
48%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercato aperto: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
Volume
$16,481Data di fine
31 ago 2026Mercato aperto
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$16,481Data di fine
31 ago 2026Mercato aperto
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti