Trump’s pattern of frequent public criticism toward political opponents, journalists, and foreign leaders continues to shape trader assessments for this market. Recent developments include his July 24-25 remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he targeted figures such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Gavin Newsom, and Kaitlan Collins by name, alongside additional press gaggles featuring pointed exchanges over the SAVE Act and voting legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune also drew direct comments amid stalled congressional priorities ahead of the August recess. With the resolution window closing August 31, scheduled events including potential Michigan travel, ongoing legislative debates, and routine media interactions create multiple opportunities for further statements. Traders weigh these catalysts against historical frequency of such remarks during periods of domestic policy focus and international diplomacy.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоНОВЕ
$16,277 Обс.
Aug 31, 2026
Joe Biden
99%
Barack Obama
95%
Nicolás Maduro
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
51%
Candace Owens
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
49%
Megyn Kelly
49%
Jerome Powell
46%
Zohran Mamdani
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
18%
Vladimir Putin
23%
Andy Burnham
15%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Alex Jones
27%
Norah O'Donnell
9%
Friedrich Merz
7%
Elon Musk
7%
Kevin Warsh
7%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Xi Jinping
6%
Viktor Orbán
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
Pam Bondi
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Melania Trump
1%
Kaitlan Collins
43%
Tucker Carlson
53%
$16,277 Обс.
Joe Biden
$2,725 Обс.
99%
Barack Obama
$1,708 Обс.
95%
Nicolás Maduro
$0 Обс.
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$0 Обс.
51%
Candace Owens
$271 Обс.
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
$0 Обс.
49%
Megyn Kelly
$2 Обс.
49%
Jerome Powell
$20 Обс.
46%
Zohran Mamdani
$0 Обс.
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$102 Обс.
18%
Vladimir Putin
$26 Обс.
23%
Andy Burnham
$1,036 Обс.
15%
Emmanuel Macron
$734 Обс.
12%
Alex Jones
$814 Обс.
27%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,039 Обс.
9%
Friedrich Merz
$522 Обс.
7%
Elon Musk
$876 Обс.
7%
Kevin Warsh
$0 Обс.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$2,083 Обс.
6%
Xi Jinping
$279 Обс.
6%
Viktor Orbán
$0 Обс.
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
$0 Обс.
5%
Pam Bondi
$0 Обс.
3%
J.D. Vance
$529 Обс.
3%
Melania Trump
$2,946 Обс.
1%
Kaitlan Collins
$361 Обс.
43%
Tucker Carlson
$203 Обс.
53%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of frequent public criticism toward political opponents, journalists, and foreign leaders continues to shape trader assessments for this market. Recent developments include his July 24-25 remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he targeted figures such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Gavin Newsom, and Kaitlan Collins by name, alongside additional press gaggles featuring pointed exchanges over the SAVE Act and voting legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune also drew direct comments amid stalled congressional priorities ahead of the August recess. With the resolution window closing August 31, scheduled events including potential Michigan travel, ongoing legislative debates, and routine media interactions create multiple opportunities for further statements. Traders weigh these catalysts against historical frequency of such remarks during periods of domestic policy focus and international diplomacy.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Ринок відкрито: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
Обсяг
$16,277Дата завершення
Aug 31, 2026Ринок відкрито
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of frequent public criticism toward political opponents, journalists, and foreign leaders continues to shape trader assessments for this market. Recent developments include his July 24-25 remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he targeted figures such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Gavin Newsom, and Kaitlan Collins by name, alongside additional press gaggles featuring pointed exchanges over the SAVE Act and voting legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune also drew direct comments amid stalled congressional priorities ahead of the August recess. With the resolution window closing August 31, scheduled events including potential Michigan travel, ongoing legislative debates, and routine media interactions create multiple opportunities for further statements. Traders weigh these catalysts against historical frequency of such remarks during periods of domestic policy focus and international diplomacy.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Обсяг
$16,277Дата завершення
Aug 31, 2026Ринок відкрито
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump’s pattern of frequent public criticism toward political opponents, journalists, and foreign leaders continues to shape trader assessments for this market. Recent developments include his July 24-25 remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he targeted figures such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Gavin Newsom, and Kaitlan Collins by name, alongside additional press gaggles featuring pointed exchanges over the SAVE Act and voting legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune also drew direct comments amid stalled congressional priorities ahead of the August recess. With the resolution window closing August 31, scheduled events including potential Michigan travel, ongoing legislative debates, and routine media interactions create multiple opportunities for further statements. Traders weigh these catalysts against historical frequency of such remarks during periods of domestic policy focus and international diplomacy.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання