The constitutional amendment process required to repeal presidential term limits imposes steep barriers, including two-thirds majorities in both chambers of Congress followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states, a threshold rarely met on divisive structural changes. Trader consensus at 96.8% for no repeal aligns with these procedural demands and the absence of coordinated legislative momentum or state-level support in 2026. Historical precedent shows term-limit proposals typically stall amid divided government or competing priorities. Realistic shifts could still emerge from an unusually unified congressional session, major realignment in state legislatures, or unforeseen crisis-driven momentum, though such paths remain narrow given current institutional checks.