The strong 91% market-implied probability for “No” reflects the Trump administration’s preference for targeted export controls and voluntary pre-release reviews aimed primarily at closed, frontier models from U.S. labs like Anthropic and OpenAI, rather than broad prohibitions on open-weight or open-source releases. Recent actions, including temporary restrictions on Fable 5 and Mythos 5 that were later lifted after safeguards, plus new guidelines exempting U.S. open models from mandatory vetting, underscore this approach. Legislative momentum, such as the Open-Source AI Leadership Act advancing in Congress to promote domestic open models while explicitly avoiding bans, further reinforces trader consensus. A realistic challenge could emerge if escalating U.S.-China tensions prompt Entity List additions or sanctions targeting specific foreign open-weight models, though enforcement against downloadable weights remains difficult.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoUS government bans an open source AI model in 2026?
US government bans an open source AI model in 2026?
9% szansa
NOWE
NOWE
Dec 31, 2026
9% szansa
NOWE
NOWE
Dec 31, 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the US federal government passes legislation, issues an executive order, issues an export control, or takes any other formal action with the intent to ban distribution to, access for, or use of an open source AI model by the general public within the US, between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves "No".
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The strong 91% market-implied probability for “No” reflects the Trump administration’s preference for targeted export controls and voluntary pre-release reviews aimed primarily at closed, frontier models from U.S. labs like Anthropic and OpenAI, rather than broad prohibitions on open-weight or open-source releases. Recent actions, including temporary restrictions on Fable 5 and Mythos 5 that were later lifted after safeguards, plus new guidelines exempting U.S. open models from mandatory vetting, underscore this approach. Legislative momentum, such as the Open-Source AI Leadership Act advancing in Congress to promote domestic open models while explicitly avoiding bans, further reinforces trader consensus. A realistic challenge could emerge if escalating U.S.-China tensions prompt Entity List additions or sanctions targeting specific foreign open-weight models, though enforcement against downloadable weights remains difficult.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the US federal government passes legislation, issues an executive order, issues an export control, or takes any other formal action with the intent to ban distribution to, access for, or use of an open source AI model by the general public within the US, between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves "No".
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Rynek otwarty: Jul 13, 2026, 10:13 PM ET
Wolumen
$4,121Data zakończenia
Jan 1, 2027Rynek otwarty
Jul 13, 2026, 10:13 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the US federal government passes legislation, issues an executive order, issues an export control, or takes any other formal action with the intent to ban distribution to, access for, or use of an open source AI model by the general public within the US, between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves "No".
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The strong 91% market-implied probability for “No” reflects the Trump administration’s preference for targeted export controls and voluntary pre-release reviews aimed primarily at closed, frontier models from U.S. labs like Anthropic and OpenAI, rather than broad prohibitions on open-weight or open-source releases. Recent actions, including temporary restrictions on Fable 5 and Mythos 5 that were later lifted after safeguards, plus new guidelines exempting U.S. open models from mandatory vetting, underscore this approach. Legislative momentum, such as the Open-Source AI Leadership Act advancing in Congress to promote domestic open models while explicitly avoiding bans, further reinforces trader consensus. A realistic challenge could emerge if escalating U.S.-China tensions prompt Entity List additions or sanctions targeting specific foreign open-weight models, though enforcement against downloadable weights remains difficult.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the US federal government passes legislation, issues an executive order, issues an export control, or takes any other formal action with the intent to ban distribution to, access for, or use of an open source AI model by the general public within the US, between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves "No".
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
“Open source AI model" refers to a general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model whose weights and source are publicly downloadable and usable on user-controlled hardware (e.g., Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen). "Source available" AI models will qualify regardless of any licensing restrictions on acceptable use. Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
To qualify, a ban must target ordinary public access to the model across ordinary public channels within the US. A ban with the intention to remove access from a single channel is not sufficient.
A qualifying ban may target a specific model or a slate of models, so long as at least one open source model is restricted.
A qualifying ban enacted or issued by the resolution date will qualify regardless of if or when it takes effect.
Both temporary bans, including those with a defined end date, and indefinite bans will qualify.
Non-binding or preliminary actions, including non-binding resolutions, recommendations, proposed or pending legislation, investigations, and hearings, will not qualify on their own.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the maintainer or developer of the relevant open source AI model. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Wolumen
$4,121Data zakończenia
Jan 1, 2027Rynek otwarty
Jul 13, 2026, 10:13 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...The strong 91% market-implied probability for “No” reflects the Trump administration’s preference for targeted export controls and voluntary pre-release reviews aimed primarily at closed, frontier models from U.S. labs like Anthropic and OpenAI, rather than broad prohibitions on open-weight or open-source releases. Recent actions, including temporary restrictions on Fable 5 and Mythos 5 that were later lifted after safeguards, plus new guidelines exempting U.S. open models from mandatory vetting, underscore this approach. Legislative momentum, such as the Open-Source AI Leadership Act advancing in Congress to promote domestic open models while explicitly avoiding bans, further reinforces trader consensus. A realistic challenge could emerge if escalating U.S.-China tensions prompt Entity List additions or sanctions targeting specific foreign open-weight models, though enforcement against downloadable weights remains difficult.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania