Trump’s second-term approach to artificial intelligence has centered on deregulation and national security collaboration rather than new mandates. The June 2, 2026, Executive Order 14409 established a voluntary 30-day government review window for select frontier models focused on cybersecurity risks, created an AI clearinghouse, and directed agencies to harden federal systems while explicitly avoiding mandatory licensing or pre-clearance requirements. Earlier 2025 orders removed prior regulatory barriers and preempted conflicting state rules. As of mid-September 2026, President Trump publicly rejected industry calls for additional limits, framing safety concerns as overstated and prioritizing U.S. competitiveness against China. Upcoming agency deadlines from the June order and any follow-on national security memoranda remain the main near-term catalysts that could shape trader assessments of further executive action.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoNUOVO
30 set 2026
30 settembre
7%
31 ottobre
43%
31 dicembre
50%
$272 Vol.
30 settembre
$268 Vol.
7%
31 ottobre
$0 Vol.
43%
31 dicembre
$5 Vol.
50%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs an executive order, proclamation, or presidential memorandum that imposes, or directs a federal agency to impose, a mandatory requirement on the training, development, or deployment of artificial intelligence models by non-governmental developers or deployers, by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Trump’s second-term approach to artificial intelligence has centered on deregulation and national security collaboration rather than new mandates. The June 2, 2026, Executive Order 14409 established a voluntary 30-day government review window for select frontier models focused on cybersecurity risks, created an AI clearinghouse, and directed agencies to harden federal systems while explicitly avoiding mandatory licensing or pre-clearance requirements. Earlier 2025 orders removed prior regulatory barriers and preempted conflicting state rules. As of mid-September 2026, President Trump publicly rejected industry calls for additional limits, framing safety concerns as overstated and prioritizing U.S. competitiveness against China. Upcoming agency deadlines from the June order and any follow-on national security memoranda remain the main near-term catalysts that could shape trader assessments of further executive action.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs an executive order, proclamation, or presidential memorandum that imposes, or directs a federal agency to impose, a mandatory requirement on the training, development, or deployment of artificial intelligence models by non-governmental developers or deployers, by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercato aperto: Sep 17, 2026, 2:28 PM ET
Volume
$272Data di fine
1 gen 2027Mercato aperto
Sep 17, 2026, 2:28 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs an executive order, proclamation, or presidential memorandum that imposes, or directs a federal agency to impose, a mandatory requirement on the training, development, or deployment of artificial intelligence models by non-governmental developers or deployers, by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Trump’s second-term approach to artificial intelligence has centered on deregulation and national security collaboration rather than new mandates. The June 2, 2026, Executive Order 14409 established a voluntary 30-day government review window for select frontier models focused on cybersecurity risks, created an AI clearinghouse, and directed agencies to harden federal systems while explicitly avoiding mandatory licensing or pre-clearance requirements. Earlier 2025 orders removed prior regulatory barriers and preempted conflicting state rules. As of mid-September 2026, President Trump publicly rejected industry calls for additional limits, framing safety concerns as overstated and prioritizing U.S. competitiveness against China. Upcoming agency deadlines from the June order and any follow-on national security memoranda remain the main near-term catalysts that could shape trader assessments of further executive action.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs an executive order, proclamation, or presidential memorandum that imposes, or directs a federal agency to impose, a mandatory requirement on the training, development, or deployment of artificial intelligence models by non-governmental developers or deployers, by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volume
$272Data di fine
1 gen 2027Mercato aperto
Sep 17, 2026, 2:28 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...Trump’s second-term approach to artificial intelligence has centered on deregulation and national security collaboration rather than new mandates. The June 2, 2026, Executive Order 14409 established a voluntary 30-day government review window for select frontier models focused on cybersecurity risks, created an AI clearinghouse, and directed agencies to harden federal systems while explicitly avoiding mandatory licensing or pre-clearance requirements. Earlier 2025 orders removed prior regulatory barriers and preempted conflicting state rules. As of mid-September 2026, President Trump publicly rejected industry calls for additional limits, framing safety concerns as overstated and prioritizing U.S. competitiveness against China. Upcoming agency deadlines from the June order and any follow-on national security memoranda remain the main near-term catalysts that could shape trader assessments of further executive action.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoCorrelati
Il governo degli Stati Uniti vieta un modello di intelligenza artificiale open source nel 2026?
8%
Sì
Il governo degli Stati Uniti rimuove l'accesso pubblico a un altro modello di intelligenza artificiale di Anthropic nel 2026?
11%
Sì
Gli Stati Uniti approvano una legge sulla sicurezza dell'IA prima del 2027?
11%
Sì
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti