President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoNUEVO
$16,513 Vol.
31 ago 2026
Barack Obama
95%
Nicolás Maduro
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
51%
Jimmy Kimmel
49%
Candace Owens
49%
Megyn Kelly
49%
Jerome Powell
46%
Zohran Mamdani
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
18%
Vladimir Putin
23%
Andy Burnham
15%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Friedrich Merz
7%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Elon Musk
7%
Kevin Warsh
7%
Papa León XIV
6%
Xi Jinping
6%
Viktor Orbán
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
Pam Bondi
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Melania Trump
1%
Kaitlan Collins
43%
Tucker Carlson
54%
Alex Jones
43%
$16,513 Vol.
Barack Obama
$1,708 Vol.
95%
Nicolás Maduro
$0 Vol.
68%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$0 Vol.
51%
Jimmy Kimmel
$0 Vol.
49%
Candace Owens
$303 Vol.
49%
Megyn Kelly
$2 Vol.
49%
Jerome Powell
$20 Vol.
46%
Zohran Mamdani
$0 Vol.
29%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$102 Vol.
18%
Vladimir Putin
$26 Vol.
23%
Andy Burnham
$1,036 Vol.
15%
Emmanuel Macron
$734 Vol.
12%
Friedrich Merz
$522 Vol.
7%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,039 Vol.
7%
Elon Musk
$876 Vol.
7%
Kevin Warsh
$0 Vol.
7%
Papa León XIV
$2,083 Vol.
6%
Xi Jinping
$279 Vol.
6%
Viktor Orbán
$0 Vol.
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
$0 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$0 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$529 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$2,946 Vol.
1%
Kaitlan Collins
$361 Vol.
43%
Tucker Carlson
$203 Vol.
54%
Alex Jones
$1,018 Vol.
43%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
Volumen
$16,513Fecha de finalización
31 ago 2026Mercado abierto
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$16,513Fecha de finalización
31 ago 2026Mercado abierto
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes