Multiple frontier labs maintain closely matched math capabilities on LiveBench, leaving traders with no dominant favorite for the end-of-October snapshot. Strong reasoning performance from Anthropic’s Claude 5 series, OpenAI’s GPT-5 variants, Google’s Gemini 3 models, and several Chinese systems (Z.ai GLM-5, Moonshot Kimi, MiniMax) reflects rapid gains from test-time compute, synthetic math data, and iterative post-training. LiveBench’s frequent refresh of contamination-free problems keeps scores volatile, while upcoming releases or fine-tunes before October could shift relative standings. The even odds capture this fluid competitive landscape and the absence of decisive recent benchmarks favoring any single provider.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วWhich company has the best AI model on LiveBench (Mathematics) end of October?
MiniMax 48%
Anthropic 48%
Baidu 41%
Amazon 38%

MiniMax
48%

Anthropic
48%

Baidu
41%

Amazon
38%

Alibaba
38%

Moonshot
37%

Meta
37%

Z.ai
37%

Microsoft
36%

ByteDance
35%

OpenAI
33%

StepFun
32%

Thinky
32%

Nvidia
31%

Mistral
29%

DeepSeek
24%

SpaceXAI
23%

Tencent
23%

24%

Xiaomi
39%

Meituan
-
MiniMax 48%
Anthropic 48%
Baidu 41%
Amazon 38%

MiniMax
48%

Anthropic
48%

Baidu
41%

Amazon
38%

Alibaba
38%

Moonshot
37%

Meta
37%

Z.ai
37%

Microsoft
36%

ByteDance
35%

OpenAI
33%

StepFun
32%

Thinky
32%

Nvidia
31%

Mistral
29%

DeepSeek
24%

SpaceXAI
23%

Tencent
23%

24%

Xiaomi
39%

Meituan
-
Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Aug 12, 2026, 8:04 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Multiple frontier labs maintain closely matched math capabilities on LiveBench, leaving traders with no dominant favorite for the end-of-October snapshot. Strong reasoning performance from Anthropic’s Claude 5 series, OpenAI’s GPT-5 variants, Google’s Gemini 3 models, and several Chinese systems (Z.ai GLM-5, Moonshot Kimi, MiniMax) reflects rapid gains from test-time compute, synthetic math data, and iterative post-training. LiveBench’s frequent refresh of contamination-free problems keeps scores volatile, while upcoming releases or fine-tunes before October could shift relative standings. The even odds capture this fluid competitive landscape and the absence of decisive recent benchmarks favoring any single provider.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย