Anthropic holds the highest market-implied odds at 32% for leading LiveBench overall at end of September, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and Claude 5 Opus variants posting the strongest recent scores on the contamination-free benchmark, ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 entries. Traders see this edge from consistent gains in reasoning, coding, and data analysis subtasks, reflecting Anthropic's focus on high-effort model scaling and safety-aligned architectures amid a tight field where multiple labs release iterative updates. Chinese developers including Z.ai and Moonshot's Kimi K3 trail closely in probability, supported by strong open-weight performance and competitive pricing that could shift rankings if September releases close capability gaps. With outcomes clustered tightly below 25% for most others, key swing factors include any late-quarter model drops or benchmark refreshes that reward demonstrated live capabilities over marketing claims.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoWhich company has the best AI model on LiveBench (Overall) end of September?
Which company has the best AI model on LiveBench (Overall) end of September?
Anthropic 52%
ByteDance 23%
Alibaba 22%
Xiaomi 22%
NOWE
NOWE
Sep 30, 2026
Anthropic
32%
ByteDance
23%
Alibaba
22%
Xiaomi
22%
DeepSeek
19%
OpenAI
19%
Moonshot
18%
Baidu
18%
Tencent
16%
Z.ai
16%
Amazon
16%
Meituan
14%
SpaceXAI
19%
Thinky
14%
Mistral
19%
Nvidia
5%
Meta
14%
MiniMax
13%
16%
Microsoft
4%
StepFun
3%
Anthropic 52%
ByteDance 23%
Alibaba 22%
Xiaomi 22%
NOWE
NOWE
Sep 30, 2026
Anthropic
$138 Wol.
32%
ByteDance
$91 Wol.
23%
Alibaba
$91 Wol.
22%
Xiaomi
$91 Wol.
22%
DeepSeek
$91 Wol.
19%
OpenAI
$91 Wol.
19%
Moonshot
$91 Wol.
18%
Baidu
$86 Wol.
18%
Tencent
$91 Wol.
16%
Z.ai
$91 Wol.
16%
Amazon
$91 Wol.
16%
Meituan
$91 Wol.
14%
SpaceXAI
$86 Wol.
19%
Thinky
$91 Wol.
14%
Mistral
$128 Wol.
19%
Nvidia
$80 Wol.
5%
Meta
$91 Wol.
14%
MiniMax
$91 Wol.
13%
$85 Wol.
16%
Microsoft
$84 Wol.
4%
StepFun
$91 Wol.
3%
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on September 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic holds the highest market-implied odds at 32% for leading LiveBench overall at end of September, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and Claude 5 Opus variants posting the strongest recent scores on the contamination-free benchmark, ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 entries. Traders see this edge from consistent gains in reasoning, coding, and data analysis subtasks, reflecting Anthropic's focus on high-effort model scaling and safety-aligned architectures amid a tight field where multiple labs release iterative updates. Chinese developers including Z.ai and Moonshot's Kimi K3 trail closely in probability, supported by strong open-weight performance and competitive pricing that could shift rankings if September releases close capability gaps. With outcomes clustered tightly below 25% for most others, key swing factors include any late-quarter model drops or benchmark refreshes that reward demonstrated live capabilities over marketing claims.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on September 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Rynek otwarty: Jul 29, 2026, 6:13 PM ET
Wolumen
$1,967Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Jul 29, 2026, 6:13 PM ETŹródło rozstrzygnięcia
https://livebench.ai/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on September 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic holds the highest market-implied odds at 32% for leading LiveBench overall at end of September, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and Claude 5 Opus variants posting the strongest recent scores on the contamination-free benchmark, ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 entries. Traders see this edge from consistent gains in reasoning, coding, and data analysis subtasks, reflecting Anthropic's focus on high-effort model scaling and safety-aligned architectures amid a tight field where multiple labs release iterative updates. Chinese developers including Z.ai and Moonshot's Kimi K3 trail closely in probability, supported by strong open-weight performance and competitive pricing that could shift rankings if September releases close capability gaps. With outcomes clustered tightly below 25% for most others, key swing factors include any late-quarter model drops or benchmark refreshes that reward demonstrated live capabilities over marketing claims.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Overall score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on September 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Wolumen
$1,967Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Jul 29, 2026, 6:13 PM ETŹródło rozstrzygnięcia
https://livebench.ai/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic holds the highest market-implied odds at 32% for leading LiveBench overall at end of September, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and Claude 5 Opus variants posting the strongest recent scores on the contamination-free benchmark, ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 entries. Traders see this edge from consistent gains in reasoning, coding, and data analysis subtasks, reflecting Anthropic's focus on high-effort model scaling and safety-aligned architectures amid a tight field where multiple labs release iterative updates. Chinese developers including Z.ai and Moonshot's Kimi K3 trail closely in probability, supported by strong open-weight performance and competitive pricing that could shift rankings if September releases close capability gaps. With outcomes clustered tightly below 25% for most others, key swing factors include any late-quarter model drops or benchmark refreshes that reward demonstrated live capabilities over marketing claims.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania