The contest for fourth place in Russia's September 2026 State Duma election reflects tight clustering among New People, LDPR, A Just Russia, and several minor parties amid United Russia's dominant lead in party-list voting. Recent polls from FOM, WCIOM, and ExtremeScan show these contenders holding steady shares in the low-to-mid teens or below, with minimal shifts in the final weeks despite Yabloko's exclusion from the ballot and Putin's framing of the vote as a test of national resolve on the Ukraine conflict. The mixed-member proportional system, 5% threshold, and single-mandate district outcomes introduce additional variability that keeps final rankings fluid. Trader pricing near 50% across multiple options captures this uncertainty, where modest changes in turnout, regional support, or late campaign dynamics could reorder the field before results finalize.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · DiperbaruiNew People (NL) 45%
Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) 33%
A Just Russia – For Truth (SRZP) 10%
Rodina 2.8%

New People (NL)
45%

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR)
33%

A Just Russia – For Truth (SRZP)
9%

Rodina
3%

Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF)
2%

United Russia (ER)
1%

Civic Platform (GP)
<1%
New People (NL) 45%
Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) 33%
A Just Russia – For Truth (SRZP) 10%
Rodina 2.8%

New People (NL)
45%

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR)
33%

A Just Russia – For Truth (SRZP)
9%

Rodina
3%

Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF)
2%

United Russia (ER)
1%

Civic Platform (GP)
<1%
This market will resolve according to the political party that wins the fourth greatest number of seats in the next Russian State Duma election.
If the results are not known definitively by September 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
The named parties or coalitions will be primarily ranked by the number of seats won in the specified election. If two or more parties are tied on seats, ties will be broken by the total number of valid votes received, with higher vote totals ranking higher. If parties remain tied, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the listed party abbreviations. This market will resolve to the party that occupies the fourth-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
This market's resolution will be based solely on the number of seats won by the named party in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.
This market will resolve based on the results of this election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results reported by Russian government sources such as the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation.
Note: If a listed party contests the election as part of a jointly listed coalition with one or more parties not listed in this market, the market corresponding to the listed party will represent the coalition and will count all seats won by the coalition collectively. If two or more listed parties contest the election as a jointly listed coalition, with or without additional parties not listed in this market, the market corresponding to the party within that coalition that won the most seats in the previous election will represent the coalition and will count all seats won by the coalition collectively. If such a coalition dissolves, each market will again represent its respective party individually.
Pasar Dibuka: Sep 1, 2026, 8:42 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the political party that wins the fourth greatest number of seats in the next Russian State Duma election.
If the results are not known definitively by September 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
The named parties or coalitions will be primarily ranked by the number of seats won in the specified election. If two or more parties are tied on seats, ties will be broken by the total number of valid votes received, with higher vote totals ranking higher. If parties remain tied, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the listed party abbreviations. This market will resolve to the party that occupies the fourth-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
This market's resolution will be based solely on the number of seats won by the named party in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.
This market will resolve based on the results of this election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results reported by Russian government sources such as the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation.
Note: If a listed party contests the election as part of a jointly listed coalition with one or more parties not listed in this market, the market corresponding to the listed party will represent the coalition and will count all seats won by the coalition collectively. If two or more listed parties contest the election as a jointly listed coalition, with or without additional parties not listed in this market, the market corresponding to the party within that coalition that won the most seats in the previous election will represent the coalition and will count all seats won by the coalition collectively. If such a coalition dissolves, each market will again represent its respective party individually.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...The contest for fourth place in Russia's September 2026 State Duma election reflects tight clustering among New People, LDPR, A Just Russia, and several minor parties amid United Russia's dominant lead in party-list voting. Recent polls from FOM, WCIOM, and ExtremeScan show these contenders holding steady shares in the low-to-mid teens or below, with minimal shifts in the final weeks despite Yabloko's exclusion from the ballot and Putin's framing of the vote as a test of national resolve on the Ukraine conflict. The mixed-member proportional system, 5% threshold, and single-mandate district outcomes introduce additional variability that keeps final rankings fluid. Trader pricing near 50% across multiple options captures this uncertainty, where modest changes in turnout, regional support, or late campaign dynamics could reorder the field before results finalize.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan