President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Polymarket डेटा का संदर्भ देने वाला प्रयोगात्मक AI-जनरेटेड सारांश। यह ट्रेडिंग सलाह नहीं है और इस बाज़ार के समाधान में कोई भूमिका नहीं निभाता। · अपडेट किया गयानया
$16,481 वॉल्यूम
31 अग, 2026
बराक ओबामा
95%
निकोलस मादुरो
68%
मार्जरी टेलर ग्रीन
51%
जिमी किमेल
49%
कैंडेस ओवेन्स
49%
मेगिन केली
49%
जेरोम पॉवेल
45%
ज़ोहरान ममदानी
29%
बेंजामिन नेतन्याहू
18%
व्लादिमीर पुतिन
23%
एंडी बर्नहैम
15%
इमैनुएल मैक्रों
12%
नोरा ओ'डॉनेल
8%
फ्रेडरिक मर्ज़
7%
एलन मस्क
7%
केविन वार्श
7%
पोप लियो चौदहवें
6%
शी जिनपिंग
6%
विक्टर ऑर्बन
5%
मोहम्मद बिन सलमान
5%
पाम बॉन्डी
3%
जे.डी. वेंस
3%
मेलानिया ट्रंप
1%
कैटलन कॉलिन्स
43%
टकर कार्लसन
53%
एलेक्स जोन्स
47%
$16,481 वॉल्यूम
बराक ओबामा
$1,708 वॉल्यूम
95%
निकोलस मादुरो
$0 वॉल्यूम
68%
मार्जरी टेलर ग्रीन
$0 वॉल्यूम
51%
जिमी किमेल
$0 वॉल्यूम
49%
कैंडेस ओवेन्स
$271 वॉल्यूम
49%
मेगिन केली
$2 वॉल्यूम
49%
जेरोम पॉवेल
$20 वॉल्यूम
45%
ज़ोहरान ममदानी
$0 वॉल्यूम
29%
बेंजामिन नेतन्याहू
$102 वॉल्यूम
18%
व्लादिमीर पुतिन
$26 वॉल्यूम
23%
एंडी बर्नहैम
$1,036 वॉल्यूम
15%
इमैनुएल मैक्रों
$734 वॉल्यूम
12%
नोरा ओ'डॉनेल
$1,039 वॉल्यूम
8%
फ्रेडरिक मर्ज़
$522 वॉल्यूम
7%
एलन मस्क
$876 वॉल्यूम
7%
केविन वार्श
$0 वॉल्यूम
7%
पोप लियो चौदहवें
$2,083 वॉल्यूम
6%
शी जिनपिंग
$279 वॉल्यूम
6%
विक्टर ऑर्बन
$0 वॉल्यूम
5%
मोहम्मद बिन सलमान
$0 वॉल्यूम
5%
पाम बॉन्डी
$0 वॉल्यूम
3%
जे.डी. वेंस
$529 वॉल्यूम
3%
मेलानिया ट्रंप
$2,946 वॉल्यूम
1%
कैटलन कॉलिन्स
$361 वॉल्यूम
43%
टकर कार्लसन
$203 वॉल्यूम
53%
एलेक्स जोन्स
$1,018 वॉल्यूम
47%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
बाज़ार खुला: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
वॉल्यूम
$16,481समाप्ति तिथि
31 अग, 2026बाज़ार खुला
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
वॉल्यूम
$16,481समाप्ति तिथि
31 अग, 2026बाज़ार खुला
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s recent remarks at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24–25 featured repeated personal attacks and revived nicknames aimed at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Jake Tapper, along with Democratic figures including Gavin Newsom, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and others. These statements occurred amid ongoing policy disputes over the Iran conflict and domestic issues, reflecting Trump’s established pattern of using public platforms to criticize opponents and media outlets. With the August 31 resolution window open, traders are monitoring scheduled speeches, social media activity, and potential campaign-style events that could produce additional targeted remarks before the deadline. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during his current term inform assessments of which individuals remain most exposed.
Polymarket डेटा का संदर्भ देने वाला प्रयोगात्मक AI-जनरेटेड सारांश। यह ट्रेडिंग सलाह नहीं है और इस बाज़ार के समाधान में कोई भूमिका नहीं निभाता। · अपडेट किया गया
बाहरी लिंक से सावधान रहें।
बाहरी लिंक से सावधान रहें।
अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न