Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoMiniMax 90%
Meituan 90%
Alibaba 37%
OpenAI 36%

MiniMax
90%

Meituan
90%

Alibaba
37%

OpenAI
36%

Moonshot
35%

Baidu
31%

Z.ai
30%

30%

Xiaomi
29%

ByteDance
29%

Tencent
29%

Microsoft
28%

StepFun
28%

Meta
27%

SpaceXAI
26%

DeepSeek
26%

Amazon
26%

Nvidia
26%

Mistral
26%

Thinky
23%

Anthropic
48%
MiniMax 90%
Meituan 90%
Alibaba 37%
OpenAI 36%

MiniMax
90%

Meituan
90%

Alibaba
37%

OpenAI
36%

Moonshot
35%

Baidu
31%

Z.ai
30%

30%

Xiaomi
29%

ByteDance
29%

Tencent
29%

Microsoft
28%

StepFun
28%

Meta
27%

SpaceXAI
26%

DeepSeek
26%

Amazon
26%

Nvidia
26%

Mistral
26%

Thinky
23%

Anthropic
48%
Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Mercado abierto: Jul 29, 2026, 6:17 PM ET
Fuente de resolución
https://livebench.ai/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Overall” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “All,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Fuente de resolución
https://livebench.ai/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic's Claude 5 family, including Fable 5 and Opus variants with max-effort reasoning modes, currently tops LiveBench overall at scores around 83, narrowly ahead of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5 Thinking releases near 81. This tight race stems from rapid 2026 iterations in large language model scale, post-training alignment, and inference-time compute that boost performance across math, coding, and reasoning categories on the contamination-free benchmark. Traders see Anthropic's edge in demonstrated consistency and OpenAI's strength in raw capability as key swing factors, with Chinese labs like Moonshot (Kimi) and MiniMax close behind but trailing on aggregate. Upcoming August updates or new model drops from these labs could shift the market-implied odds before month-end resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes