Trump's pattern of direct public criticisms through statements, social media, or interviews remains a central driver of this market, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or officials during periods of policy debate or electoral activity. In the current mid-2026 environment, attention centers on potential flashpoints around congressional negotiations, primary contests, and executive actions, where disagreements over legislation or appointments could prompt comments. Historical precedent shows such remarks frequently arise around high-visibility events or personal disputes rather than following a fixed schedule. Traders weigh the timing window through July 31 against the absence of any single dominant controversy in recent weeks, noting that outcomes depend on unfolding developments in Washington and campaign cycles. Structural factors like term limits or institutional roles play limited direct roles here compared to the individual's communication style.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$67,266 交易量

玛乔丽·泰勒·格林
14%

凯特兰·柯林斯
41%

杰罗姆·鲍威尔
33%

亚历克斯·琼斯
14%

基尔·斯塔默
14%

弗里德里希·梅尔茨
10%

吉米·坎摩尔
9%

弗拉基米尔·普京
9%

塔克·卡尔森
9%

埃隆·马斯克
8%

梅根·凯利
8%

坎迪斯·欧文斯
8%

Norah O'Donnell
8%

本雅明·内塔尼亚胡
7%

教皇良十四世
7%

帕姆·邦迪
5%

凯文·沃什
5%

欧尔班·维克托
4%

穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼
2%

J.D.万斯
2%

习近平
1%

梅拉尼娅·特朗普
<1%

Zohran Mamdani
31%

埃马纽埃尔·马克龙
48%
$67,266 交易量

玛乔丽·泰勒·格林
14%

凯特兰·柯林斯
41%

杰罗姆·鲍威尔
33%

亚历克斯·琼斯
14%

基尔·斯塔默
14%

弗里德里希·梅尔茨
10%

吉米·坎摩尔
9%

弗拉基米尔·普京
9%

塔克·卡尔森
9%

埃隆·马斯克
8%

梅根·凯利
8%

坎迪斯·欧文斯
8%

Norah O'Donnell
8%

本雅明·内塔尼亚胡
7%

教皇良十四世
7%

帕姆·邦迪
5%

凯文·沃什
5%

欧尔班·维克托
4%

穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼
2%

J.D.万斯
2%

习近平
1%

梅拉尼娅·特朗普
<1%

Zohran Mamdani
31%

埃马纽埃尔·马克龙
48%
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source for this market will be public statements from Donald Trump.
市场开放时间: Jun 29, 2026, 3:09 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source for this market will be public statements from Donald Trump.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's pattern of direct public criticisms through statements, social media, or interviews remains a central driver of this market, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or officials during periods of policy debate or electoral activity. In the current mid-2026 environment, attention centers on potential flashpoints around congressional negotiations, primary contests, and executive actions, where disagreements over legislation or appointments could prompt comments. Historical precedent shows such remarks frequently arise around high-visibility events or personal disputes rather than following a fixed schedule. Traders weigh the timing window through July 31 against the absence of any single dominant controversy in recent weeks, noting that outcomes depend on unfolding developments in Washington and campaign cycles. Structural factors like term limits or institutional roles play limited direct roles here compared to the individual's communication style.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于


警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题