The extended procedural timelines in the ICJ South Africa v. Israel case represent the dominant factor behind the 82% trader consensus on “No.” In May 2026 the court set South Africa’s reply deadline for November 2027 and Israel’s rejoinder for May 2029, pushing any potential merits hearing and judgment well beyond December 2027. The parallel ICC arrest warrants target war crimes and crimes against humanity rather than genocide, and no international court has issued a genocide conviction against Israel or its officials. High evidentiary requirements for proving specific intent, combined with ongoing third-state interventions and the absence of enforcement mechanisms, further reduce the near-term probability of an adverse finding.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено$91,457 Обс.
$91,457 Обс.
$91,457 Обс.
$91,457 Обс.
For the judgment of an ad hoc tribunal to be relevant for purposes of this market, the tribunal must be established by the United Nations or any body thereof.
A first-instance conviction or judgment shall qualify for "Yes" resolution even if it remains subject to appeal or has not yet been affirmed on appeal.
Preliminary or provisional findings that are not judgments on the merits will not qualify for purposes of this market.
The resolution source will be official statements from the ICC, the ICJ, or a qualifying ad hoc tribunal; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Ринок відкрито: Jun 29, 2026, 3:31 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the judgment of an ad hoc tribunal to be relevant for purposes of this market, the tribunal must be established by the United Nations or any body thereof.
A first-instance conviction or judgment shall qualify for "Yes" resolution even if it remains subject to appeal or has not yet been affirmed on appeal.
Preliminary or provisional findings that are not judgments on the merits will not qualify for purposes of this market.
The resolution source will be official statements from the ICC, the ICJ, or a qualifying ad hoc tribunal; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The extended procedural timelines in the ICJ South Africa v. Israel case represent the dominant factor behind the 82% trader consensus on “No.” In May 2026 the court set South Africa’s reply deadline for November 2027 and Israel’s rejoinder for May 2029, pushing any potential merits hearing and judgment well beyond December 2027. The parallel ICC arrest warrants target war crimes and crimes against humanity rather than genocide, and no international court has issued a genocide conviction against Israel or its officials. High evidentiary requirements for proving specific intent, combined with ongoing third-state interventions and the absence of enforcement mechanisms, further reduce the near-term probability of an adverse finding.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено



Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання