Open gubernatorial seats in states like Ohio, Georgia, Alaska, and Minnesota, combined with recent forecaster shifts toward toss-up or lean ratings, underpin trader consensus around these outcomes for the narrowest 2026 margin. Competitive candidate fields, including high-profile matchups in Ohio and shifting polling in Iowa and Nevada, heighten uncertainty in battlegrounds where partisan leans are modest and no incumbent anchors the result. Recent rating updates from groups like Cook and Sabato, reflecting tighter dynamics in Alaska and Ohio, have reinforced positioning for these states over safer holds in places like Florida or Texas. Factors that could consolidate support include late-cycle polling consolidation, primary outcomes clarifying nominees, or economic signals amplifying turnout differentials in swing electorates.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoGeorgia 17.0%
Ohio 14.3%
Minnesota 13.2%
Alaska 13.1%
$16,181 Vol.
$16,181 Vol.
Georgia
24%
Ohio
14%
Minnesota
13%
Alaska
13%
Texas
13%
Nevada
9%
Flórida
7%
Iowa
7%
Kansas
6%
Oregon
6%
Colorado
5%
Vermont
4%
Michigan
4%
New Mexico
3%
Arizona
2%
Wisconsin
2%
New Hampshire
2%
Maine
1%
Georgia 17.0%
Ohio 14.3%
Minnesota 13.2%
Alaska 13.1%
$16,181 Vol.
$16,181 Vol.
Georgia
24%
Ohio
14%
Minnesota
13%
Alaska
13%
Texas
13%
Nevada
9%
Flórida
7%
Iowa
7%
Kansas
6%
Oregon
6%
Colorado
5%
Vermont
4%
Michigan
4%
New Mexico
3%
Arizona
2%
Wisconsin
2%
New Hampshire
2%
Maine
1%
This market will resolve according to the US gubernatorial race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all listed gubernatorial elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado Aberto: Jun 29, 2026, 4:01 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the US gubernatorial race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all listed gubernatorial elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Open gubernatorial seats in states like Ohio, Georgia, Alaska, and Minnesota, combined with recent forecaster shifts toward toss-up or lean ratings, underpin trader consensus around these outcomes for the narrowest 2026 margin. Competitive candidate fields, including high-profile matchups in Ohio and shifting polling in Iowa and Nevada, heighten uncertainty in battlegrounds where partisan leans are modest and no incumbent anchors the result. Recent rating updates from groups like Cook and Sabato, reflecting tighter dynamics in Alaska and Ohio, have reinforced positioning for these states over safer holds in places like Florida or Texas. Factors that could consolidate support include late-cycle polling consolidation, primary outcomes clarifying nominees, or economic signals amplifying turnout differentials in swing electorates.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado


Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions