President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於最新
$16,513 交易量
2026-08-31
巴拉克·歐巴馬
95%
尼古拉斯．馬杜羅
68%
瑪喬麗·泰勒·格林
51%
吉米·金梅爾
49%
坎迪斯·歐文斯
49%
梅根·凱利
49%
傑羅姆·鮑威爾
46%
Zohran Mamdani
29%
班傑明·納坦雅胡
18%
弗拉基米爾·普京
23%
安迪·伯納姆
15%
艾曼紐·馬克宏
13%
弗里德里希·梅爾茨
7%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
伊隆·馬斯克
7%
凱文·沃什
7%
教宗良十四世
6%
習近平
6%
維克多·奧班
5%
穆罕默德·本·薩勒曼
5%
潘·龐迪
3%
J.D.范斯
3%
梅蘭妮亞·川普
1%
Kaitlan Collins
43%
塔克·卡爾森
54%
亞歷克斯·瓊斯
41%
$16,513 交易量
巴拉克·歐巴馬
$1,708 交易量
95%
尼古拉斯．馬杜羅
$0 交易量
68%
瑪喬麗·泰勒·格林
$0 交易量
51%
吉米·金梅爾
$0 交易量
49%
坎迪斯·歐文斯
$303 交易量
49%
梅根·凱利
$2 交易量
49%
傑羅姆·鮑威爾
$20 交易量
46%
Zohran Mamdani
$0 交易量
29%
班傑明·納坦雅胡
$102 交易量
18%
弗拉基米爾·普京
$26 交易量
23%
安迪·伯納姆
$1,036 交易量
15%
艾曼紐·馬克宏
$734 交易量
13%
弗里德里希·梅爾茨
$522 交易量
7%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,039 交易量
7%
伊隆·馬斯克
$876 交易量
7%
凱文·沃什
$0 交易量
7%
教宗良十四世
$2,083 交易量
6%
習近平
$279 交易量
6%
維克多·奧班
$0 交易量
5%
穆罕默德·本·薩勒曼
$0 交易量
5%
潘·龐迪
$0 交易量
3%
J.D.范斯
$529 交易量
3%
梅蘭妮亞·川普
$2,946 交易量
1%
Kaitlan Collins
$361 交易量
43%
塔克·卡爾森
$203 交易量
54%
亞歷克斯·瓊斯
$1,018 交易量
41%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間： Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
交易量
$16,513結束日期
2026-08-31市場開放時間
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$16,513結束日期
2026-08-31市場開放時間
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward journalists and Democratic figures continues to shape expectations for this market as his second term progresses into August 2026. At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on July 24, he delivered an extended address featuring direct remarks aimed at reporters including Kaitlan Collins, as well as opponents such as Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Gavin Newsom. Additional exchanges, including a recent exchange with a journalist over legislative questions, illustrate the same approach during routine press interactions. With roughly 30 days remaining until the August 31 cutoff, traders monitor scheduled speeches, press briefings, and legislative developments that historically prompt similar comments from the president.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions