President Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in connection with immigration enforcement operations and related protests, including in Los Angeles in June 2025 and Minnesota in January 2026 after shootings involving ICE agents sparked demonstrations. No invocation has occurred despite these statements and earlier border-related reviews that recommended against it. Trader positioning reflects the law’s broad statutory language allowing presidential deployment of active-duty forces for law enforcement when ordinary judicial processes are deemed impracticable, balanced against institutional restraint, ongoing court scrutiny of related National Guard actions, and the approach of the November 2026 midterms. Potential catalysts include escalation of protests against federal operations or disputes over election administration.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於$1,127,161 交易量
9月30日
2%
12月31日
16%
$1,127,161 交易量
9月30日
2%
12月31日
16%
For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Jan 6, 2026, 10:17 AM ET
For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
President Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in connection with immigration enforcement operations and related protests, including in Los Angeles in June 2025 and Minnesota in January 2026 after shootings involving ICE agents sparked demonstrations. No invocation has occurred despite these statements and earlier border-related reviews that recommended against it. Trader positioning reflects the law’s broad statutory language allowing presidential deployment of active-duty forces for law enforcement when ordinary judicial processes are deemed impracticable, balanced against institutional restraint, ongoing court scrutiny of related National Guard actions, and the approach of the November 2026 midterms. Potential catalysts include escalation of protests against federal operations or disputes over election administration.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於



警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions