The expiration of the New START Treaty on February 5, 2026, removed the last binding bilateral limits on U.S. and Russian deployed strategic nuclear warheads and delivery systems, along with associated verification measures. Russia had proposed in September 2025 that both sides continue observing the treaty’s central numerical limits informally for up to one year, but the United States did not formally accept and instead signaled interest in a new, modernized agreement that could incorporate China and address non-strategic systems. Early February talks on the sidelines of Ukraine-related discussions in Abu Dhabi produced reports of a possible short-term understanding, though no formal extension or replacement accord was confirmed. Trader assessments of a deal by any near-term deadline now hinge on prospects for renewed bilateral or trilateral negotiations amid the Ukraine conflict, sanctions regimes, and differing priorities on verification and third-party arsenals. No major diplomatic breakthroughs have been reported since the treaty lapsed.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$660,693 交易量
9月30日
1%
12月31日
3%
$660,693 交易量
9月30日
1%
12月31日
3%
Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
市场开放时间: Jul 29, 2026, 2:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The expiration of the New START Treaty on February 5, 2026, removed the last binding bilateral limits on U.S. and Russian deployed strategic nuclear warheads and delivery systems, along with associated verification measures. Russia had proposed in September 2025 that both sides continue observing the treaty’s central numerical limits informally for up to one year, but the United States did not formally accept and instead signaled interest in a new, modernized agreement that could incorporate China and address non-strategic systems. Early February talks on the sidelines of Ukraine-related discussions in Abu Dhabi produced reports of a possible short-term understanding, though no formal extension or replacement accord was confirmed. Trader assessments of a deal by any near-term deadline now hinge on prospects for renewed bilateral or trilateral negotiations amid the Ukraine conflict, sanctions regimes, and differing priorities on verification and third-party arsenals. No major diplomatic breakthroughs have been reported since the treaty lapsed.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于



警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题